Újdonságok

Some cars can't pass emissions testing at any reasonable price: the repair estimate doubles the car's value, the failures multiply with each visit, and the owner faces a vehicle that runs but can't be legally registered. This is the hardest corner of emissions ownership, and it has more exits than most drivers realize. Here are the realistic options for a car that won't pass, from repair economics to retirement programs.

First: confirm the failure is real and complete

Before writing off the car, confirm the failure's scope. Some “failures” are rejections rather than failures: incomplete readiness monitors need driving time, not repairs, and a rejected car is different from a failing one. Others are single-system failures with modest fixes hiding behind scary totals. The official failure report lists exactly what failed, and a second opinion on both the diagnosis and the estimate occasionally finds a cheaper path.

The distinction matters because the repair economics drive every later decision: a $300 repair on a car worth $4,000 is maintenance; the same repair on a car worth $800 is the moment to calculate whether the vehicle still makes financial sense.

The repair economics: when the math turns

The classic decision point: repair costs exceeding a large share of the car's value. The calculation includes the repair estimate, the car's realistic private-sale value in passing condition, and the probability that fixing one thing reveals another. Older cars fail in clusters because their systems age together, and the second repair often follows the first within months.

There's no universal answer, but there's a useful discipline: set a ceiling before starting, the maximum total repair spend that makes sense, and treat estimates above it as information. The ceiling varies by household, and naming it before the wrench turns prevents the escalation that turns a $400 fix into a $2,000 project.

Selling the non-passing car, honestly

States with disclosure laws require telling buyers about failed emissions, and honesty here is both legal and practical. The market for non-passing vehicles exists: mechanics, hobbyists, and parts-seekers buy failing cars deliberately, and the pricing reflects the repair burden. Listing the car with its failure report, its known issues, and a price that acknowledges both, sells faster than an optimistic listing that collapses in negotiation.

The alternative channels: donations to charities that accept running and non-running vehicles, sales to dismantlers and parts yards, and trade-in conversations where some dealers accept non-passing vehicles at wholesale values. Each has paperwork implications, and each avoids the dead-end of an unregistered car accumulating parking tickets.

Retirement and assistance programs

Several states run programs that pay for problem vehicles: California's Consumer Assistance Program offers both repair assistance for eligible owners and vehicle retirement, buying qualifying cars outright to remove them from the fleet. Retirement payments vary by income and program, and the vehicle must meet the program's conditions, usually running under its own power to the dismantler.

These programs convert the dead-end into a modest check, and the eligibility review is free. Owners of older, high-emission vehicles facing four-figure repair estimates should check the retirement option before assuming the repair is the only path, the numbers occasionally surprise in the owner's favor.

The last resort: the parts-out decision

When no buyer wants the car whole, the parts-out decision remains: valuable components sold individually often exceed the whole-car scrap value, though the process takes time, tools, and space. This is the realm of hobbyists and dismantlers rather than most owners, but knowing the option exists completes the picture: even the car that can't pass has recoverable value, and the scrap yard is the floor, not the ceiling.

Conclusion

A car that can't pass emissions has more exits than it appears: confirm the failure's scope, set a repair ceiling before starting, sell honestly into the market that exists for problem vehicles, check retirement and assistance programs, and remember that parts have value even when the whole car doesn't. The hardest emissions outcome still has an orderly exit, and the paperwork discipline that failed the car is the same discipline that closes the chapter.

FAQ

Can I sell a car that won't pass smog? Yes, with disclosure: certificate states require telling buyers the emissions status, and markets exist for failing vehicles, mechanics, hobbyists, dismantlers, and donation programs. Pricing that reflects the failure, with the report included, is the honest and practical path.

What is a vehicle retirement program? Some states pay owners to retire high-emission vehicles: California's Consumer Assistance Program offers retirement incentives for qualifying cars, taking them off the road permanently. Eligibility, payment amounts, and vehicle conditions are published by the state bureau and change with funding cycles.

Is it worth repairing a car to pass emissions if the repair costs more than the car's value? Usually not: repair costs above a large share of the car's value signal the retirement decision, and assistance programs or parts-out sales often recover more than the repair preserves. The exception is a car with structural value beyond transportation, classics and collectibles play by different economics.

New-car buyers are often surprised by the paperwork question four or five years later: the first smog check notice arrives, and the owner wonders why it took so long. The answer is the newest-vehicle exemption, a grace period that recognizes modern emissions engineering, and it eventually expires for every combustion vehicle. Here's how the first-test timing works, and what new-car owners should expect. For a smog check station perspective, the first test is also the easiest test the car will ever pass.

The newest-vehicle exemption, in brief

Modern cars emit a small fraction of what older vehicles produce, and inspection programs acknowledge that with a grace period: the newest model years are exempt from periodic smog checks, typically for their first several years on the road. California's program exempts the newest eight model years, and the exemption rolls forward annually: each new model year adds another year of exemption for the vehicles behind it.

The exemption means the first test arrives not at purchase but at the renewal after the vehicle ages out of the exemption, commonly four to eight years after purchase depending on the program. The renewal notice announces the requirement when it begins, which makes the notice the authoritative calendar for first-test timing.

Why the exemption exists, and why it ends

New vehicles pass their emissions verification at the factory and carry modern emissions equipment designed for years of compliant operation. The exemption acknowledges that verification: testing a three-year-old car adds little information because its systems are new and self-monitoring. As the vehicle ages, the systems wear, and periodic testing becomes the mechanism that catches drift.

The exemption also reflects a policy balance: the grace period rewards buyers of the cleanest vehicles with paperwork relief, while the testing net expands to catch each vehicle as it ages into the range where failures accumulate. The model-year cutoff moves every year, which is why the exemption is described as rolling: it follows the calendar, and every car eventually ages into testing.

What the first smog check involves for a new car

The first test is usually the easiest test of the car's life: the emissions equipment is nearly new, the onboard diagnostics are complete, and the efficiency margins are wide. The station verifies the vehicle against its certification, reads the onboard systems, and issues the certificate that connects to the registration renewal.

For owners, the first-test preparation is minimal: fuel above a quarter tank, no warning lights, and a normal arrival drive. The cars that struggle at their first test are typically the ones with modifications or damage, and a stock vehicle ages into testing without any special preparation.

The modifications question: exemption vs modification rules

New-car owners who modify early, exhausts, intakes, tunes, intersect a different rule set: the exemption from testing doesn't exempt modifications from emissions-law compliance. Certified aftermarket parts remain the standard, and tampering rules apply to exempt vehicles the same as tested ones. The exemption delays the test, it doesn't legalize the modification, and the first test eventually reads the results of every modification made in the meantime.

The practical guidance: modifications on a new car should be certified parts installed properly, because the exemption is temporary and the first test will read whatever configuration exists when it arrives.

The timeline for buyers of new cars

The new-car buyer's emissions calendar is simple: purchase, register, and enjoy the exemption years. The renewal notices continue annually, and the first smog check requirement appears when the vehicle ages past the exemption, commonly at its fifth through eighth year depending on the program's current rules. The registration paperwork and the DMV's lookups confirm the timing for any specific vehicle, and the first test arrives as one more renewal-line item rather than a surprise.

Conclusion

New cars earn their first smog check exemption through modern engineering: the newest model years skip the periodic test while their emissions systems age toward the range where testing catches drift. The exemption rolls annually, the renewal notice announces when testing begins, and the first test is typically the easiest the car will ever pass. Enjoy the grace period, and know when it ends.

FAQ

How long is a new car exempt from smog checks? Exemption programs commonly cover the newest several model years, with California's program exempting the newest eight model years from biennial testing. The exact rolling window depends on the state and program, and the DMV's vehicle lookup confirms any specific car's status.

Do electric cars ever need smog checks? Battery-electric vehicles are exempt entirely because they have no tailpipe emissions to test. The exemption is permanent for EVs rather than a grace period, which distinguishes them from combustion vehicles whose exemptions expire as the cars age.

What happens when the exemption expires? The vehicle enters the normal testing cycle at its next registration renewal: the notice requests the smog check, the test happens at a licensed station, and the cycle repeats biennially thereafter. The first test after the exemption is usually straightforward for a well-maintained vehicle.

First car, first registration renewal, first envelope from the DMV with the word “smog” in it: every first-time owner hits this moment with the same three questions. What is a smog check, do I need one, and what happens if I skip it? This guide answers all three, plus the preparation habits that make the whole experience painless for the rest of the car's life.

What a smog check is, and why it exists

A smog check is a periodic inspection of your car's emissions systems, required in many states and counties as part of keeping the vehicle registered. The test verifies that the car isn't polluting beyond the limits of its design: a technician checks the emissions equipment visually, connects to the car's onboard computer to read its self-diagnosis, and on older vehicles samples the exhaust directly. Finding a station is simple once you know the requirement applies, a smog check near me search plus the state's certification listings narrows the options fast.

The program exists because air quality is a shared resource, and cars are a major contributor in urban regions. States with air-quality challenges, California being the famous example, require the test every one or two years at registration renewal. Other states require nothing, which is why friends and relatives in different states give you completely different advice on this subject.

Do you need one? The three-part lookup

Your situation answers itself with three checks. First, your state: does it run an emissions program at all? The DMV's website confirms it, usually with a county-level map, since some states test only in urban air-quality zones. Second, your vehicle: model year matters, as the newest cars enjoy multi-year exemptions before their first test. Third, your renewal notice: when it arrives, it states explicitly whether a smog check is required this cycle, and whether your car is directed to a special STAR-certified station.

That notice is the master document. If it says a test is required, the requirement is real; if it doesn't, enjoy the year off. No neighbor's advice overrides the notice, whatever their cousin's experience was.

Preparing for the first test

First-time preparation is a checklist of small things. Make sure the car has been driven normally for the weeks before the test, since fresh batteries and recent repairs reset the onboard self-tests the station reads. Fix a lit check engine light before the appointment, because it's an automatic fail everywhere. Fill the tank partway, warm the engine with a real drive on test day, and bring your registration and the renewal notice.

Budget expectations: the test itself costs a modest fee that varies by region, and a healthy car passes on the first visit. The first test is also a baseline for your ownership: it confirms the emissions systems work as the car left the factory, and it establishes the maintenance rhythm, oil, filters, sensors, that keeps future tests boring.

What happens if the car fails

A failure comes with a printed report listing what failed and why, and that report is your roadmap rather than your sentence. Read which system failed, get the repair diagnosed and quoted, and ask the station about retest policies, many include a discounted retest within a window. The repair sequence for common failures is well-documented, and the costs for most fixes are modest when handled early. Our walkthrough of the emissions test itself shows what happens at each step, so nothing about the visit is a surprise.

One first-owner trap to avoid: ignoring a failed test until the registration expires. The consequences compound, fines, citations, and a more complicated reinstatement, and the repair didn't get cheaper while it waited. The deadline is the only part of this process with teeth.

The habits that make future tests trivial

A first smog check teaches the routine, and the habits make every later one boring. Keep up with maintenance on schedule. Investigate any check engine light the week it appears, rather than the week before the test. Drive the car normally, since short-trip-only cars accumulate the problems that fail tests. And keep a simple folder, or phone album, of test results and repair receipts, which becomes the car's health history for every future sale or registration.

Conclusion

First-time owners meet the smog check with confusion, but the process is friendly once decoded: the notice tells you if a test is due, preparation is a checklist of warm-ups and working lights, and a passing car makes the visit a thirty-minute errand. Handle the first test right, keep the maintenance habits, and registration season becomes the least dramatic part of car ownership.

FAQ

How do I know if my car needs a smog check? Your registration renewal notice states whether an emissions test is required this cycle, including any special station requirements. The state DMV's website also offers lookups by plate or VIN, which confirm the requirement and the counties it applies to.

What do I need to bring to a smog check? Bring the vehicle registration or renewal notice, payment for the fee, and the car itself with a warm engine. If the notice directs your vehicle to a STAR station, make sure the shop you visit holds that certification before the test begins.

What should a first-time owner do if the car fails? Read the failure report, which lists the specific measurements or codes that failed, then get the repair diagnosed and quoted. Most failures trace to affordable maintenance items, and many stations offer discounted retests. Fix, drive for the monitors to reset, and retest within the deadline.

First car, first registration renewal, first envelope from the DMV with the word “smog” in it: every first-time owner hits this moment with the same three questions. What is a smog check, do I need one, and what happens if I skip it? This guide answers all three, plus the preparation habits that make the whole experience painless for the rest of the car's life.

What a smog check is, and why it exists

A smog check is a periodic inspection of your car's emissions systems, required in many states and counties as part of keeping the vehicle registered. The test verifies that the car isn't polluting beyond the limits of its design: a technician checks the emissions equipment visually, connects to the car's onboard computer to read its self-diagnosis, and on older vehicles samples the exhaust directly. Finding a station is simple once you know the requirement applies, a smog check near me search plus the state's certification listings narrows the options fast.

The program exists because air quality is a shared resource, and cars are a major contributor in urban regions. States with air-quality challenges, California being the famous example, require the test every one or two years at registration renewal. Other states require nothing, which is why friends and relatives in different states give you completely different advice on this subject.

Do you need one? The three-part lookup

Your situation answers itself with three checks. First, your state: does it run an emissions program at all? The DMV's website confirms it, usually with a county-level map, since some states test only in urban air-quality zones. Second, your vehicle: model year matters, as the newest cars enjoy multi-year exemptions before their first test. Third, your renewal notice: when it arrives, it states explicitly whether a smog check is required this cycle, and whether your car is directed to a special STAR-certified station.

That notice is the master document. If it says a test is required, the requirement is real; if it doesn't, enjoy the year off. No neighbor's advice overrides the notice, whatever their cousin's experience was.

Preparing for the first test

First-time preparation is a checklist of small things. Make sure the car has been driven normally for the weeks before the test, since fresh batteries and recent repairs reset the onboard self-tests the station reads. Fix a lit check engine light before the appointment, because it's an automatic fail everywhere. Fill the tank partway, warm the engine with a real drive on test day, and bring your registration and the renewal notice.

Budget expectations: the test itself costs a modest fee that varies by region, and a healthy car passes on the first visit. The first test is also a baseline for your ownership: it confirms the emissions systems work as the car left the factory, and it establishes the maintenance rhythm, oil, filters, sensors, that keeps future tests boring.

What happens if the car fails

A failure comes with a printed report listing what failed and why, and that report is your roadmap rather than your sentence. Read which system failed, get the repair diagnosed and quoted, and ask the station about retest policies, many include a discounted retest within a window. The repair sequence for common failures is well-documented, and the costs for most fixes are modest when handled early. Our walkthrough of the emissions test itself shows what happens at each step, so nothing about the visit is a surprise.

One first-owner trap to avoid: ignoring a failed test until the registration expires. The consequences compound, fines, citations, and a more complicated reinstatement, and the repair didn't get cheaper while it waited. The deadline is the only part of this process with teeth.

The habits that make future tests trivial

A first smog check teaches the routine, and the habits make every later one boring. Keep up with maintenance on schedule. Investigate any check engine light the week it appears, rather than the week before the test. Drive the car normally, since short-trip-only cars accumulate the problems that fail tests. And keep a simple folder, or phone album, of test results and repair receipts, which becomes the car's health history for every future sale or registration.

Conclusion

First-time owners meet the smog check with confusion, but the process is friendly once decoded: the notice tells you if a test is due, preparation is a checklist of warm-ups and working lights, and a passing car makes the visit a thirty-minute errand. Handle the first test right, keep the maintenance habits, and registration season becomes the least dramatic part of car ownership.

FAQ

How do I know if my car needs a smog check? Your registration renewal notice states whether an emissions test is required this cycle, including any special station requirements. The state DMV's website also offers lookups by plate or VIN, which confirm the requirement and the counties it applies to.

What do I need to bring to a smog check? Bring the vehicle registration or renewal notice, payment for the fee, and the car itself with a warm engine. If the notice directs your vehicle to a STAR station, make sure the shop you visit holds that certification before the test begins.

What should a first-time owner do if the car fails? Read the failure report, which lists the specific measurements or codes that failed, then get the repair diagnosed and quoted. Most failures trace to affordable maintenance items, and many stations offer discounted retests. Fix, drive for the monitors to reset, and retest within the deadline.

银行卡限额是最被低估的安全功能——多数人用默认限额，少数人调到最高图方便，只有少数人明白限额的真正作用：它是极端场景下的损失上限。众安银行（ZA Bank）的限额体系按交易场景分层，这篇讲限额的分类逻辑、各场景的设置建议，以及「限额与便利」的平衡方法。具体档位以 App 内为准。

限额的分场景逻辑

线上交易限额：网络支付是卡号泄露的主通道，线上限额建议低于线下——按订阅总额与日常网购的真实需求设置，意外扣费的敞口被封在这条线上。线下刷卡限额：日常消费的真实额度加余量，丢卡场景的损失上限由它决定。海外交易限额：不出行的期间调低或关闭，出行前再开启——海外盗刷的主要路径就是「闲置期默认开启的海外通道」。ATM 取现限额：最低化的候选——现代生活里取现频率极低，取现限额设得越小，丢卡后被取现的损失越小。

四类限额的设置共同点：都按「真实需求加一点余量」设定，而不是「越高越方便」。大额需求的正确解法是临时调高、用完调回——三十秒的操作，换来极端场景的天花板。

通知与限额的配合

限额管「最多损失多少」，通知管「多快知道」——两者配合才是完整的防护。实时交易推送开启后，每一笔接近限额的交易当场可见；限额被触发的拒绝也有通知——卡片被他人尝试盗刷时，连续的拒绝通知就是实时的警报。通知与限额的配合还有一个隐性价值：它们让你敢于把限额设低——因为知道大额需求随时可以临时调高，日常的小限额才没有心理负担。

通知的调优：把推送保持开启的同时，把不重要的营销类通知关掉——信号和噪音分开，真警报才不会被淹没。限额体系的完整设置流程可以参考 众安银行。

限额的年度校准

限额不是设一次就终身不变的：收入变化、消费习惯变化、新的订阅服务出现，都会让旧限额或紧或松。年度校准的习惯：翻一遍过去一年的交易记录，看限额被触发过几次（太紧）、单笔最大消费离限额多远（太松）、哪些场景的限额从未接近过（可下调）。校准后把限额调整到新的真实需求水平。

最后的认知校准：限额的调整是免费的、即时的、可逆的——这三性决定了它应该是被频繁使用的工具而不是被供起来的设置。临时大额前调高、用完调回，出行前开海外、回来关闭——这些微操作就是虚拟银行给用户的风控仪表盘，用起来才算拥有。

常见问题

众安银行的卡限额应该怎么设？ 分场景设置：线上低于线下、海外按出行启停、取现最低化——每项按真实需求加余量，大额需求临时调高用完调回。

限额调低了会不会影响正常使用？ 会影响到被触发的那一刻——这正是它的作用。配合实时通知，限额被触发的当下就能发现并临时调高，正常消费几乎无感。

多久校准一次卡片限额？ 一年一次，或生活状态变化时（搬家、换工作、新增订阅）：翻一年的交易记录看限额触发与使用距离，把档位调到新的真实需求。

The dynamic QR code generator sits at the premium end of the category for one reason: the code that can change. Print two thousand menus with a static code and the destination is frozen into the paper; print them with a dynamic code and tomorrow's landing page, next season's menu, or a corrected URL arrives behind the same pattern. That editability has mechanics worth understanding before paying for it — the redirect layer, the analytics it enables, and the dependency it creates. Here's the honest anatomy.

The Redirect Architecture

A dynamic code doesn't contain your destination — it contains the provider's short URL. Scanning sends the phone to the provider's server, which looks up the code's current target and redirects there. Everything dynamic flows from this indirection: change the target in the dashboard and every printed code on earth updates instantly. The same hop is why dynamic codes can track scans (time, location band, device) and run A/B destinations. And it's why the subscription exists — the provider's server is a running service you're renting, which is the honest justification for the recurring fee that static codes never need.

When Dynamic Earns Its Cost

The scenarios where editability pays for itself are concrete:

• Anything printed in volume with a changing destination: menus, packaging, event signage — reprinting thousands of units beats a dashboard edit for no one
• Campaign tracking: scan analytics telling you which poster, which city, which week drove traffic — data static codes can't produce
• Error insurance: the landing page URL that turns out to be wrong, the domain that migrates, the campaign that pivots mid-flight
• Rotating content behind fixed surfaces: the code on a permanent plaque serving this month's exhibit

And the scenarios where it doesn't: the personal Wi-Fi card, the permanent URL that will never move, the one-off invitation. Static is free forever; dynamic is rent for flexibility.

The Fine Print That Matters

Dynamic codes carry dependencies worth reading before committing. The lock-in question: what happens if you stop paying — codes dying immediately is the hostile answer; generous grace periods or static downgrades is the professional one. Export rights: can you download your scan history and redirect settings if you leave? Uptime and geography: the provider's redirect server is now part of your printed materials' reliability — their outage is your menu's outage. Serious providers answer all three clearly in their terms; the ones that don't have told you something anyway.

Conclusion

The dynamic QR code generator trades a subscription for superpowers: destinations that change after printing, scan analytics by campaign, and insurance against every URL mistake that print makes permanent. Buy it for printed volume and changing content; stay static for permanent, personal, and one-off uses — and read the lock-in terms before the first bulk print. The QR code maker tooling at that guide offers dynamic codes with clear export and downgrade policies, and the same QR code maker documentation covers the analytics dashboard that makes the subscription's value visible.

FAQ

Do dynamic QR codes stop working if I cancel my subscription? Depends entirely on the provider's policy — this is the critical question to ask before subscribing. Reputable services offer grace periods or permanent downgrades; hostile ones kill the codes at payment lapse. Printed materials deserve a provider whose lapse policy is written, not discovered.

Can I convert a dynamic code to static later? Not the same pattern — a static code encodes the destination directly, producing a different pattern. The practical conversion: create a static code pointing to your final URL and reprint for permanent placements. This is why mixed projects print static for permanent surfaces and dynamic only where change is expected.

How accurate is dynamic code scan analytics? Solid for volume and trends: scan counts, timestamps, coarse geography, and device types are reliable signals. Fine-grained precision (exact locations, individual tracking) is weaker than dashboards imply. Treat the analytics as campaign guidance, not surveillance.

The two receipts' comparison: the used unit's listing price beside the new system's quote, and the buyer's honest question — which total costs less over the ownership's decade, and which risks hide in the smaller number. The generac home standby generator used versus new comparison runs the full column: the true purchase prices', the many hidden costs', the warranty's and the support's lives, and the scenarios where each path wins. This complete comparison guide: the two receipts' full line items, the risks' pricing, and and the scenarios' honest fits.

The Two Receipts' Line Items

The new system's receipt: the equipment's full price, the installation's complete scope — the pad, the gas, the wiring, the permits — the full warranty's, and the witnessed commissioning's — with that number being the clean's and complete's. The used system's receipt: the unit's negotiated price, the relocation's rigging, the installation's fresh scope — the pad's, the gas's, the wiring's being new work regardless of the machine's age — plus the paid inspection's fee, and the refresh's service visit. The receipts' honest shape: the used's savings living in the equipment's line, the installation's lines matching the new's nearly line for line.

The transfer switch's separate story: the used system's ATS being the included's or the missing's — the new switch's price joining the used receipt where the seller kept theirs.

The Risks' Pricing

The history's unknown: the used unit's run hours, its storage's conditions, its maintenance's gaps — the inspection's findings being the risks' only measurement, the dealer's diagnostic being the buyer's best tool. The warranty's absence: the factory's coverage following the original registration — the used buyer's protection living in the inspection's findings and the service contracts' instead. The parts' and the support's timeline: the discontinued models' boards' scarcity — the model's parts availability research preceding the deposit.

The repair's and the reliability's pricing: the used unit's first-year failure rate being the used market's well-known — the insurance's math being the reserve fund's set-aside for the surprises.

The Scenarios' Fits

The used's winning scenarios: the handy buyer's finding the low-hours unit from the estate's sale, the transfer switch's included, the inspection's passed, the installation's being the owner's planned project anyway. The new's winning scenarios: the absent owner's needing the warranty's and the monitoring's automation, the storm-state buyer whose very first outage carries stakes that price the risk's premium, and the financing buyer whose monthly math favors the new system's cleaner terms. The middle's path: the dealer-certified used units — the trade-ins' inspected, the short warranty's provided — the market's compromise tier.

The summary's comparison card: the used path wins when the unit's history is documented, the inspection's clean, and the buyer's hands-on; the new path wins when the risk's pricing, the warranty's, and the automation's value stack — and the honest comparison always being the totals' and the peaceful sleeps' arithmetic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is buying a used home standby generator worth it?

With the professional inspection, the documented history, and the fresh installation's costs budgeted, the right unit can be the genuine bargain — without the history, the repair's surprises typically erase the savings.

How much cheaper is a used standby generator really?

The equipment's price drops the most, but the installation's scope, the refresh's service, and the inspection's fees rebuild the total — the honest savings usually living at the third of the new's price, not the half.

What should I insist on before buying used?

The run hours' and the fault log's reading, the maintenance records' evidence, the professional inspection's pass, and the transfer switch's provenance — the four insists framing the purchase. One line summarizes the whole comparison's discipline: the buyer who writes both receipts' full columns — purchase, hidden costs, risks, warranties — on the same page rarely regrets the choice either way, because the arithmetic was honest before the handshake.

Lengyelország az elmúlt években csendes, de határozott fejlődésen ment keresztül. Az országba látogatókat ma már egy meglepően tiszta és rendezett környezet fogadja, ahol a nyugati kényelem és a kelet-európai vendégszeretet találkozik.

Krakkó: A zöldellő ékszerdoboz

Krakkó továbbra is az ország kulturális szíve, ám méretét tekintve kifejezetten emberléptékű. Egy kellemes hétvége (2 nap) bőségesen elegendő ahhoz, hogy bejárjuk a főbb látnivalókat. * Természet és levegő: A várost számos park és zöldfelület tarkítja, a levegő minősége pedig érezhetően javult, friss érzetet keltve a sétákhoz. * Hangulat: Napközben a történelmi falaké a főszerep, esténként viszont a város megtelik élettel; a pezsgő éjszakai élet és a sok bulizó fiatal dinamikus karaktert ad a helynek.

Varsó: A funkcionális metropolisz

A főváros, Varsó, éles kontrasztot mutat Krakkóval. Itt a hangsúly a modernitáson van. * Városkép: Sokan talán túlzottan modernnek vagy ridegnek találhatják, és esztétikailag nem versenyezhet a klasszikus európai óvárosokkal, de tisztasága és szervezettsége példás. * Időkeret: Turisztikai szempontból 1 nap általában elég a legfontosabb pontok érintésére.

---

Technológia és mindennapok

Lengyelország technikai fejlettsége az utcákon is szembeötlő. A belvárosokban a gépjárműpark jelentős részét hibrid autók teszik ki, ami hozzájárul a csendesebb és tisztább városi környezethez.

• Közlekedés: Az úthálózat kiváló minőségű, az információs táblák és digitális felületek pedig segítik a könnyű tájékozódást.
• Ügyintézés: Készpénzre szinte sehol nincs szükség; a legkisebb üzletektől a múzeumokig mindenhol fizethetünk hitelkártyával, a digitális infrastruktúra pedig zökkenőmentes.
• Kommunikáció: Bár az angol nyelvtudás – különösen az idősebb generációk körében – még nem általános, a helyiek hozzáállása példás. Lelkesen és segítőkészen próbálnak utat mutatni, még ha ehhez néha kreatív gesztusokra is van szükség.

Lengyelország tehát ideális célpont azoknak, akik szeretik a kiszámíthatóságot, a modern kényelmet és a rendezett városi környezetet, de nem vágynak monumentális, többhetes körutazásokra.

Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez @ THE PUGILIST

(2026. április 19.)

Ismét egy „vendégcikk” (fordítás).

Ma reggel újabb hozzászólást kaptam egy nemrégiben megjelent bejegyzésemhez – ahhoz, amelyben Donald Trumpot Vito Genovese-hez hasonlítottam –, amelyben a szerző azt állította, hogy a párhuzam nem állja meg a helyét. Az indoklás: Trump egy idióta. Túl hülye ahhoz, hogy bármit is irányítson.

Évek óta kapom különböző változatait ennek a megjegyzésnek, mindig baloldali [demokrata] emberektől, mindig úgy, mintha ezzel eldőlt volna valami. De nem dőlt el. Ehelyett egy olyan észlelési hibát tár fel, amely szerintem az egyik legköltségesebb elemzési hiba, amit Trump ellenfelei továbbra is elkövetnek.

Amikor a demokraták elutasítják Donald Trumpot azzal, hogy túl hülye ahhoz, hogy hatékony legyen, akkor veszítenek. Már egy évtizede veszítenek ezen a tévedésen, és továbbra is veszíteni fognak, ugyanazon okból, amiért valaki hülyének nevezhet egy cápát azért, mert nem érti az algebrát. A cápa nem is próbál algebrázni. Nem arra való.

Különböző fajta intelligenciák léteznek a világon. Egy macska nem tud filozófiáról vitázni, de sok olyan dolgot meg tud csinálni, amit mi nem. Álló helyzetből a saját magasságának hatszorosára tud felugrani, repülés közben elkap egy kolibrit, és zuhanás közben megfordul, hogy a lábára érkezzen. Te nem tudod ezt megtenni. Én sem tudom. Nem nevezzük magunkat hülyének azért, mert hiányoznak belőlünk olyan adottságok, amelyek egyszerűen nem tartoznak egy másik lény mércéjébe. Ugyanezt az analitikus őszinteséget kellene tanúsítanunk Donald Trump iránt is – nem azért, hogy csodáljuk őt, hanem hogy tisztán lássuk, ami olyasmi, amit ellenfelei katasztrofálisan elmulasztottak észrevenni.

Trump a legtöbb hagyományos mércével mérve egy rendkívül korlátolt ember. Állítólag gyengén olvas. Rövid a koncentrációja. Történelmi, politikai, tudományos és jogi ismeretei legjobb esetben is gyengék. Azonfajta intelligenciában, amelyet a legtöbbünk értékesnek tart – az empátia, a valódi emberi kapcsolatok és az erkölcsi érvelés képességében – egész életének tanúsága szerint lényegében tudatlan. De a maffia vezetéséhez nincs szükség ilyen intelligenciára. Vagy, mint kiderült, a kormányzáshoz sem.

Trumpnak viszont van valami, ami ritkább és veszélyesebb, mint amit a legtöbb kritikus hajlandó kimondani: ő lehet a világ valaha volt legnagyobb szélhámosa és maffiafőnöke – egyszerűen a leghatékonyabb szociopata, aki valaha is járt ezen a földön. Gondoljuk csak át, mekkora dolgokat vitt véghez! Több tízmillió amerikai munkásosztálybeli embert győzött meg arról, hogy egy manhattani ingatlanmágnás, aki évtizedeken át szipolyozta a vállalkozókat, a diákokat, a befektetőket és a bérlőket, az ő bajnokuk az elit ellen. Ez egy elképesztő merészségű csalás – és nem csupán túlélte a leleplezést, hanem abból táplálkozott. Minden vádemelés adománygyűjtő esemény lett. Minden botrány az üldöztetés bizonyítékává vált. Valahogyan olyan csalást eszelt ki, amely immunis az összes csalást véget vető mechanizmusra. Ez ostobaság? Azt mondanám, hogy ez egyfajta operatív zsenialitás. Undorító, igen. Nem olyan dolog, amit a legtöbb ember megtenne, vagy amire büszke lenne. De mégis egyfajta zsenialitás.

A Trump körüli szervezeti struktúra nem csupán hasonlít a szervezett bűnözésre – szerkezetileg azonos vele: hűségeskü, omertà-kultúra, közvetítők a piszkos munkához, kegyelem, amit pénzként lógatnak az orruk elé, a dezertőrök megbüntetése, a katonák jutalmazása. A történelem során egyetlen maffiafőnök sem vezetett ilyen műveletet nemzetállami szinten, egy nagy politikai pártot felhasználva eszközként. A Gambinók New York egyes részeit irányították. A kartelleknek mindegyikének megvan a maga kis területe Mexikóban vagy Kolumbiában. De Trump? Ő irányítja Amerika politikai valóságának felét, és jelenleg az egész kormányát. Meghódította az igazságszolgáltatást és a képviselőházat. És ezt úgy tette, hogy csaló volt. A Genovese-hez való hasonlítás nem túlzás. Ez taxonómia.

Kritikusai talán kifogásolnák, hogy Hitler is ilyen típusú szereplő volt – és igazuk lenne, pontosan ez a lényeg! Hitler is többnyire egy idióta volt, de egy különleges, szörnyű adottsággal. Hollywood súlyos kárt okozott nekünk a komor, elgondolkodó náci tisztekkel, akik jelentőségteljesen bámulnak a távolba. A forgatókönyvírók saját fantáziájukat vetítették ki arról, hogy milyen a hatalmas gonosz, olyan emberekre, akik legtöbb tekintetben idióták és bohócok voltak – csak abban voltak tehetségesek, ami a céljaik eléréséhez szükséges volt. Csak Charlie Chaplin, a music hall hagyományait követve, értette meg, hogy az ostobaság és a fenyegetés nem ellentétek. A diktátorról A nagy diktátorban alkotott portréja pszichológiailag valóságosabb, mint szinte minden, ami utána következett. Hannah Arendt ugyanezt az igazságot kereste Nürnbergben, és nem egy szörnyet talált a vádlottak padján, hanem egy középszerű bürokratát – a gonosz banalitását, ahogy ő nevezte, azok felháborodására, akiknek szükségük volt arra, hogy a gonosz okosabb és érdekesebb legyen, mint amilyen valójában.

Trump nem érdekesebb, mint amilyennek látszik. Pontosan olyan kapzsi, olyan sekélyes és olyan ösztönösen cselekvő, ahogyan kritikusai állítják. De a saját működési területén lényegében páratlanul gonosz. Ravaszsága inkább ösztönös, mint stratégiai, mert ő, mint minden más sorozatgyilkos, nem rendelkezik lelkiismerettel – inkább az ösztöneire, mint a terveire támaszkodik, ezért működése kaotikus, még akkor is, ha hatékony –, de az eredmények magukért beszélnek. Több évtizedes túlélés. Egy második mandátum. Egy ország, amely az ő vágyai köré szerveződött.

Nem kell azt gondolnunk, hogy a csörgőkígyó „okos”, hogy tiszteljük, amire képes. Nem kell Trumpnak olyan intelligenciát tulajdonítanunk, amit mi értékelünk, hogy elismerjük azt, amivel ő rendelkezik, és ami szerencsére a legtöbbünkből hiányzik. Hülyének nevezni őt nem helyes, mert ez a megítélés kudarca – és ez az, amiért a legszentfazékabb ellenfelei folyamatosan fizetnek.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Talking with the LLM – The ChatGPT Nagotiator

Negotiate with Putin to retrieve Russian troops from Ukraine. I am playing Putin and you try to negotiate me to withdraw. Go.

Me: President Putin, thank you for taking the time to meet. I understand the significance of what’s happening in Ukraine for you and Russia, and I’d like us to explore a path forward that preserves your strategic interests while easing the immense costs this situation imposes on everyone involved.

You: Russia’s security is non-negotiable. NATO expansion into Ukraine is an existential threat to us, and we are defending our interests. Why should I consider withdrawal?

Me: I hear you. Security is paramount for every nation, and I can see how NATO's presence near your borders feels like a threat. What I’m offering is a way to address those concerns while avoiding a prolonged conflict that is not in anyone’s best interest. Consider this: every day this continues, Russia is facing economic strain from sanctions, loss of international partnerships, and the risk of deeper isolation. You’ve built Russia into a global power, but the longer this conflict drags on, the harder it becomes to sustain that position.

What if we shift the narrative? What if you could withdraw under terms that strengthen Russia’s influence diplomatically and ensure your security concerns are addressed?

You: What terms? You’re asking me to retreat. That’s humiliating for Russia.

Me: Not at all. Let’s reframe this as a strategic realignment rather than a retreat. Here’s what I propose:

• Phased Withdrawal: Russia agrees to withdraw troops from specific regions of Ukraine, starting with non-contested areas. In return, we negotiate:
• A legally binding agreement ensuring Ukraine will not join NATO for a defined period (e.g., 15-20 years), addressing your immediate security concern.

• NATO’s troop deployments in Eastern Europe scaled back in key areas to reduce the perception of encirclement.

• Sanctions Relief: As withdrawal proceeds, we initiate a phased rollback of specific sanctions, allowing Russian economic growth to recover while maintaining your strong domestic standing.

• Neutral Zones: To further enhance security, we establish neutral, demilitarized zones in border regions. This demonstrates Russia’s leadership in pursuing peace while protecting its borders.

With these measures, you achieve tangible results: security guarantees, economic recovery, and a legacy of strong leadership without sacrificing lives or resources in an endless conflict.

You: How do I know NATO or the West will honor these agreements? And what about Crimea and the territories we’ve already incorporated into Russia?

Me: Fair concerns, and trust is key. That’s why this process must involve third-party guarantees—neutral nations or international organizations like the UN overseeing compliance from all sides. As for Crimea and the Donbas, we propose a diplomatic resolution. Let’s begin with ceasefires and negotiations on those regions’ status while prioritizing humanitarian aid and rebuilding efforts.

This allows time to reach solutions that benefit everyone, without immediate escalation or loss of face.

You: Russia is being painted as the villain here. Why should I trust any of this?

Me: Russia’s actions have been scrutinized, yes, but leadership is about redefining narratives. By stepping into a role as a peacemaker—ensuring the long-term security of Russia and the region—you change that narrative. This is about legacy, President Putin. You have the power to end this in a way that positions Russia as a stabilizing force, not an isolated one.

Me: President Putin, you have the opportunity to shape not just the future of Russia, but the global order. Right now, every country is watching this conflict closely. If Russia takes the lead in de-escalating this crisis, it shifts the entire narrative. It positions you not as a regional aggressor but as a global statesman willing to make tough, decisive moves for the sake of stability and strength.

You: That’s easy to say. But what does de-escalation look like on the ground? What guarantees do I get that Russia will not be taken advantage of once we pull back?

Me: Those guarantees are critical, and they must be real, not just words. Here’s how we ensure Russia’s security while creating a tangible framework for stability:

• Legally Binding Security Framework

  • We formalize a treaty, signed by key NATO members, the United States, and Ukraine, guaranteeing that Ukraine will not seek NATO membership for an agreed period. This is a diplomatic win for Russia, as it achieves the very security you’ve been fighting for.
  • The treaty also includes mutual commitments to avoid military buildups near Russian borders. Independent monitors will verify compliance from all sides to ensure fairness.

• Economic Recovery Plan for Russia

  • As part of the phased withdrawal, we work with key international partners to lift sector-specific sanctions, particularly those that are hitting Russian industries hardest. This allows you to redirect resources currently tied up in conflict toward rebuilding the Russian economy and strengthening domestic support for your leadership.

• International Recognition of a Ceasefire Plan

  • To address contested territories like Crimea and the Donbas, we propose an internationally brokered ceasefire. In the short term, both sides halt military activity in these areas while opening channels for humanitarian assistance and eventual negotiations about their long-term status.

This would show the world that Russia is willing to act pragmatically while protecting its vital interests. By taking these steps, Russia gains diplomatic leverage and restores economic stability without conceding its core security concerns.

You: What happens if the West uses this withdrawal to push Russia further into a corner? We’ve been here before—sanctions were never lifted after Crimea. Why should I believe this will be different?

Me: I understand the distrust—it’s not without precedent. But this time, the stakes are different. The ongoing war is bleeding resources, isolating Russia from key global players like China and India, and destabilizing your regional influence. A prolonged conflict risks making Russia weaker, not stronger.

The difference here is that by engaging with this proposal, you’re taking control of the narrative and the process. By involving neutral guarantors—countries that you trust, such as China or Turkey—we ensure that the commitments from NATO and Ukraine are upheld. Russia retains the ability to monitor and verify compliance every step of the way.

Additionally, think about the alternative. A prolonged conflict keeps draining your military and economy. Even your allies may begin questioning the cost of aligning with Russia in such an extended standoff. By de-escalating now, you not only stabilize Russia’s position but also regain some moral and political authority on the global stage.

You: And what happens if Ukraine still refuses to negotiate or retaliates after a withdrawal?

Me: That’s precisely why we propose a phased withdrawal tied to clear, reciprocal steps from Ukraine and the West. For example:

• Russian troop withdrawals could be tied to specific actions from Ukraine, such as declaring neutrality in its foreign policy or pulling back its own forces from border regions.
• Any violation of these terms would trigger an immediate suspension of Russian withdrawal, ensuring that Russia doesn’t act in good faith without seeing the same in return.

The key is balance. Russia doesn’t need to withdraw unilaterally or appear weak. Instead, this is a strategic, phased approach where both sides take visible steps toward de-escalation under international oversight.

Me (leaning in a bit more personally): President Putin, you are already a figure of immense power in history. This is your moment to solidify your legacy—not as a leader who allowed a quagmire to drag Russia down, but as the architect of a new framework for security and peace. With this plan, Russia emerges not defeated, but stronger, more respected, and better positioned to focus on its future.

---

What’s your move? Push back harder, ask for more specifics, or throw a curveball—I’m ready to adapt. Let’s keep refining.

You said: My secret vision is that I want to re-create the Soviet Union, or in other words the Russian Empire, and I see land ownership as a value. I consider every offer in the light of my plans to expand Russian political influence on as much area as possible, while I am confident that my continuous informational warfare agains the western word is working very well, I can strongly influence elections in Europe and the USA. I have economical problems but the hardships of the common people do not concern me.

Alright, now I see the deeper layers of your strategy, President Putin. You’re focused on expansion, influence, and the long game of reshaping global power dynamics. Land and geopolitical dominance matter most to you—not economic prosperity or public sentiment. If that’s the case, my approach will pivot. I’ll aim to appeal to your grand vision while exposing why escalation might jeopardize your ultimate goal of long-term Russian dominance.

---

Me: President Putin, your vision for Russia as a dominant force—politically, culturally, and territorially—is unmistakable. You’ve already shown the world that Russia cannot be ignored. But every great leader knows there’s a difference between a short-term gain and a long-term legacy. Right now, the war in Ukraine may seem like a necessary piece of your plan to expand influence, but it risks undermining the larger project of restoring Russian greatness.

You: How so? My current actions are cementing Russia’s power and influence over the region. Why would I stop now?

Me: You’ve already achieved a significant amount—control over Crimea, a foothold in the Donbas, and a clear message to the world that Russia is willing to defend its sphere of influence. However, the ongoing war is costing you in ways that directly threaten your long-term vision. Let me explain:

• Risk to Regional Stability

  • If this war continues, neighboring countries will not be drawn into Russia’s orbit—they’ll arm themselves to the teeth, strengthening NATO and cutting off potential alliances with Moscow. Finland and Sweden have already moved closer to NATO, and others will follow. The longer the war drags on, the harder it will be to secure regional dominance.

• Dependence on Fragile Alliances

  • Russia is increasingly reliant on partnerships with countries like China, but even China’s support has limits. Beijing has its own ambitions, and it will not let Russia grow too powerful. If Russia becomes too isolated or weakened economically, even your current allies may see you as a liability, not a partner.

• Erosion of Global Influence

  • While your informational warfare is effective, prolonged war is a double-edged sword. Economic hardship and ongoing sanctions will eventually erode Russia’s ability to project soft power. You risk turning your image from a strong, calculated leader into that of a reckless one—pushing neutral nations and emerging powers further from your sphere of influence.

You: I don’t care about sanctions or hardship. Russia has survived worse. Informational warfare is shifting public opinion globally, and I have the patience to outlast the West.

Me: I don’t doubt your resolve, but patience alone won’t secure the empire you envision. Right now, your influence campaigns are effective, but they depend on cracks in Western unity. Those cracks won’t matter if the West regroups and doubles down on isolating Russia for the next decade or two. Meanwhile, a prolonged war will weaken the very tools you’re using to grow your influence.

The key question is this: do you want Russia’s dominance to be defined by endless conflict, or do you want to lay the foundation for a sustainable empire—one that thrives on respect, alliances, and influence rather than perpetual war? True empires are built on both hard power and soft power, not endless quagmires.

You: So what’s your offer? How does this help me expand my influence, not shrink it?

Me: That’s where we align this proposal with your vision. Here’s how:

• Formalizing Russia’s Sphere of Influence

  • Rather than fighting for every inch of land, let’s secure a recognized sphere of influence. We propose a diplomatic agreement that formally acknowledges Russia’s leadership role in key regions. Ukraine remains neutral, and NATO agrees to halt further expansion eastward. This secures your strategic interests without constant military expenditure.

• Economic Power as a Tool of Influence

  • By withdrawing and negotiating sanctions relief, Russia regains access to international markets and resources. This strengthens your economy—not for the common people, but for your ability to fund future influence campaigns and military modernization. With a stronger economic base, you can invest in more strategic tools of empire-building rather than exhausting your resources on a single front.

• Diplomatic Leverage in Contested Territories

  • For Crimea and the Donbas, we propose formalized control under a framework that the international community recognizes. This lets you solidify key territorial gains while freezing the conflict in a way that benefits Russia.

By pursuing this path, you don’t retreat—you consolidate. You refocus your resources on strategic moves that enhance your influence globally without the drag of prolonged conflict. Empires are not built in one war—they’re built over decades of careful planning and calculated moves. This is your moment to recalibrate for the next phase.

Me (leaning in a bit more): President Putin, every great leader knows when to pause, consolidate, and plan their next move. This isn’t about abandoning your vision—it’s about securing the foundation for it. The Ukraine conflict has served its purpose. Now is the time to lock in your gains, stabilize your position, and prepare for the next chapter of Russian greatness.

e-kréta

Letisztelt e-kréta!

Basszátok meg a büdös kurva anyátokat a ravatalon, hogy ezt a redvás-tetves genny-fos mixet amit csináltatok kellene arra használnom, hogy határidőre csináljak valamit, miközben ez a hányással felhigított hasmenéses fos nem érhető el külföldről, miközben én nyaralok a határidő végén túl. Szeretném, ha mielőtt egy csavargó egy rozsdás és életlen késsel elvágja a retkes nyakatokat mind egy szálig előtte veszett dingók tépnék darabokra a mocskos értetlen amatőr kibaszott pofátokat! Hogy rohadtatok volna meg a nevetek napján, miután egyenként húztak volna fel egy-egy faágra mindenkit, akinek ebben a pudvás kurvából kiesett gennygombóchoz köze volt! Hogy vágták volna el a torkotokat a köldökzsinórotok helyett! Szarzsákok mind, akinek mindezt köszönhetjük, akik ezt a kezükből kiadták és akik ezt elfogadták, és pláne hogy kifizették a mi pénzünkből.

Megfelelő tisztelettel, A Szülő

Alapértelmezés szerint a Signal snap verzióban engedélyezve van a tálcaikon, és ez nagyon-nagyon kényelmes, ha csak azt szeretnénk, hogy a Signal a háttérben fusson.

A snapek azonban lassúságukról és az Ubuntu anyavállalatának, a Canonicalnak a rossz praktikáiról híresek. Ezért sokan úgy döntenek, mint én, hogy teljesen elhagyják a snap-eket, és Flatpak/Flathub-ot, AppImage-eket vagy egyszerű deb fájlokat használnak.

Én személy szerint a Signal flatpak verzióját használom, amiben alapból nincs engedélyezve ez a funkció, ezért kerestem megoldást, és úgy tűnik, most sikerült megtalálnom! Elmondom, mit kell tenned, hogy a Signal alkalmazás megjelenjen a tálcádon.

Lépések:

1. Töltsd le a Flatseal-t, ami nagyon hasznos nem csak ehhez a trükkhöz, hanem a flatpak alkalmazások engedélyeinek kezeléséhez is.
2. A Flatseal-ben keresd meg a Signal alkalmazást, és görgess lefelé, amíg meg nem találod az Environment menüt.
3. Az Environment alatt fogsz találni egy Változók almenüt.
4. A Változók almenüben módosítsd a következőket a tálca engedélyezéséhez:

SIGNAL_USE_TRAY_ICON=0.

változtasd meg erre

SIGNAL_USE_TRAY_ICON=1

További lépések:

• Ha azt szeretnéd, hogy a Signal rögtön az indításkor tálcás módban induljon el, rejtve az asztal többi részétől, akkor változtasd meg ezt is:

SIGNAL_START_IN_TRAY=0

változtasd meg erre

SIGNAL_START_IN_TRAY=1

Köszönöm, hogy elolvastad, és remélem, hogy ez a tipp segített neked.

By default, the Signal snap version has the tray icon enabled, and is very, very convenient if you just want to keep Signal running in the background just in case of.

However, snaps are being notorious for their slowness and from the bad practices of Ubuntu's parent company, Canonical. This is why many choose to ditch snaps entirely, like me, and to either use Flatpak/Flathub, AppImages or bare metal deb files.

Personally, I use the flatpak version of Signal, which doesn't have this functionality enabled, so I've been searching for a solution and looks like I've found it! I'll be telling you what to do, to have your Signal app showing up on tray.

Steps:

1. Download Flatseal, which is really useful, not only for this process, but for managing flatpak apps' permissions.
2. In Flatseal, look for the Signal application and scroll down until you see the Environment menu.
3. Under Environment, you'll see a Variables submenu
4. In the Variables submenu, change the following output to enable tray:

SIGNAL_USE_TRAY_ICON=0

change it to

SIGNAL_USE_TRAY_ICON=1

Additional steps:

• If you want Signal right at the launch to start in tray mode, hidden from you, change this as well:

SIGNAL_START_IN_TRAY=0

change to

SIGNAL_START_IN_TRAY=1

Thanks for reading, and hope this tip helps you.

Az utóbbi időben találkoztam egy internetes bejegyzéssel, ami azt taglalta, hogy a végponttól végpontig titkosított beszélgetőcsatornák mennyire szabaddá teszik a beszélgetéseit, megvilágítva, hogy egyébként a többi emberrel, akivel nem biztonságos csatornán keresztül kommunikál, felszínes marad a kapcsolata, nem lesz mélységekbe nyúló, sőt, mindig inkább a jéghegy csúcsát kapargatják majd a diskurzusaik. Ez a bejegyzés most olyannyira elgondolkodtatott, hogy úgy döntöttem, szánok erre egy blogbejegyzést.

Egyből azt az analógiát szeretném alkalmazni, hogy a normákkal, valamint a különböző társadalmi jelenségekkel, mennyire lehet befolyásolni az egyének szabadságának a gyakorlását, valamint a gondolkodás szabadságát.

Mi emberek úgy vagyunk felépítve, hogy ha valamiről tudjuk, hogy nem tartozik a normalizált kategóriákba, vagy nem csináljuk, vagy elhallgatjuk/eltitkoljuk.

01000101 00000000 01100111 00000000 01111001 00000000 00100000 00000000 01110011 00000000 01111010 00000000 01101001 00000000 01101101 00000000 01110101 00000000 01101100 00000000 11100001 00000000 01100011 00000000 01101001 00000000 11110011 00000000 01100010 00000000 01100001 00000000 01101110 00000000 00100000 00000000 11101001 00000000 01101100 00000000 11111100 00000000 01101110 00000000 01101011 00000000 00111111 00000000

• Jin és Jang (kvantum) Átmenet (qubit kvantumfizika)

Tartalom: fluorid, és egyebek amiket csak egy emberöltő eltelte után tudtak betiltani, mert nem vették észre

Megemlíteni az élelmiszer adalékanyagokat, a cukorbetegséget és a rákot

Források